Reviews and Opinions


I sent in my Rode NT2A microphone as I love the Mic, but felt it a little shallow on detail. I was extremely pleased with the professional manner on how the service was carried out and obviously the new and improved sound quality. My Rode NT2A now sounds just as good as my $6,000 AKG C12VR.

--Nj, Atlanta, curvdmotion.com




This is the first time I came across professional microphones, not to say any related upgrades. With all the doubts and worries on money wastage, especially when I am still an unemployed student, John really unconditionally provided the best and most detailed objective advice, helping me to choose the right and most suitable microphone, which no other internet research could have done. It was his great in-depth understanding of his profession and devotion of work showed through the many email conversations we had over weeks, which I'll always be appreciative of, that I found it to be a very reliable, and must-be-done, service--knowing this is my first microphone, $300+ in value, along with letting someone who resides outside of my country that I've never met before, handling it.

The microphone, a Rode NT1000, turned out to be another surprising relief. The vocal I recorded sounds so clear, in-tune, and sensitive; as dimensional as if you were hearing a professional singer standing in front of you using every breath to carry out the emotions and meanings of the song to touch your mind. Knowing I am not even a trained singer, just another teenager who loves the joy of singing. As loud-singing and vocal recording are two totally different things, the upgraded Rode NT1000, where cheap parts were all replaced by germany and japan-made high quality parts, really emphasized the difference. You get to hear what your vocal is really like when it appears in a recording. Perhaps you are another great singer, capable of touching and inspiring others with your voice, but never came to realize this just because of a shortage of the equipment.

Now, if you have done any research on professional condenser microphones, a price range between $150-200 is considered very low, which is just about the price you could purchase a used NT1000, and that's what I've got and am more than satisfied with. The purchase of the upgrade itself is definitely worthwhile, and the key reason to why I described how my mic performed on a vocal record. It is something we could put it as, "why would you buy a gun if you are not going to get any bullets?"

So, whether you are already a professional in the music producing industry, or an amateur looking forward to pursuing your dream, this microphone upgrade will be something that refines your great piece of music with such a small price--enabling you one step forward on the road of success with all the confidence you will get from this instrument's add-on improvement.

--D. Yan, (Canada/China)




I bought an NTK years ago after reading several glowing reviews by nationally well-known engineers; when I got mine and warmed it up, it sounded like crap--like a cheap Pacific rim knock-off with an attitude. I couldn't believe it. That is, I didn't believe it--I'm ashamed to say I didn't trust my ears. I didn't return it. I thought, "Well, the real engineers with all these top-selling album credits must be hearing something different. Maybe it's my preamp, maybe it's my converters, maybe I need more expensive cabling, etc..." I'd put the mic away for a year or so, then get it out again, thinking," This is supposed to be a really good mic; I'll try it again." Of course, it sounded just as bad. Then, as a last resort, I bought another tube for it, a New Old Stock tube manufactured in the U.S. in the '60s to replace the third-world suppository that was in it. With great hopes, I switched tubes and warmed it up--but it sounded just as bad. I finally admitted to myself that it really did sound like dog doo, and decided to sell it. When I looked up the going prices for NTK's on eBay, however, I was appalled: I was going to take a big hit, probably losing well over half of its already heavily discounted retail price, even though it was still like new. I hated finding out I'd been such a sucker. The emperor was butt naked, but I hadn't wanted to admit it 'cause the "experts" said his clothes were so cool.

Then I saw John Bonnell's little ad. He had the nerve to say how harsh and brittle it sounded (his opinion was exactly the same as mine), and that he could make an NTK sound good for a hundred bucks, so I decided to give it a shot. Not much to lose, right?

Well, I just got it back today. The actual turnaround was about a week, including shipping. He wasn't just blowin' smoke--it sounds really good! The harshness and brittleness are gone, but the detail remains. Let me say it again--the NTK really sounds good! My only regret is that I didn't record it before I sent it to him; all I have is my memory of its previous crappitude, but now I do have proof that it sounds good! If you have an NTK, send it to John Bonnell now!

BTW, I've been in the recording industry for 40 years, won two Dove awards, and recorded over 20 albums. I know a little about sound and recording. And I'm not so easily fooled by "experts" anymore.

--Don Francisco

Got my MXL V67 back yesterday and just finished an A/B test with it this morning. Talk about night and day. All that brittle top end has been smoothed out and the mic has a nice warmth to it that it didn’t have before.

Nice work, sir.

I’ve included a couple of audio files from the A/B test I did.

MXL V67 Pre-Upgrade

MXL V67 Post-Upgrade

-- Jay, Potbelly Studios




Great job!!, John, on my AKG SE-300 and Sennheiser ME-64. Much quieter, and nicer/richer sounding...Very pleased!!!...I really like the fuller, in-depth, sound they have now, thanks!!

--George S., (FL)




John,

Thanks for the mods. I do quite a bit of instrumental recording, and the modded MXL 2003 is really nice for steel string acoustic guitar. The MXL V67G seemed to open up after the mod, and works nicely on nylon string guitar.

--Scott Reed, www.scottreed.com




Oh John, this mic doesn't sound as good as a vintage--IT SOUNDS BETTER!!! YOU ARE THE MAN!!! I have over 30 mics in my Studio A building: U87, U47, KSM, etc. I use very inexpensive mics at home such as this one. The modded NT2-A has blown me away. I am going to order another for Studio A, and have it sent to you. Going to have to dedicate my next grammy to you! Thanks again.

--Derris, Cap Studios




I got the mic today and it sounds terrific, just as you promised. The stock version was almost unusable because of its peakiness on sibilants.

Upgraded Rode NT1-A

--Jerry Immel, www.jerryimmel.com




The Rode NTK sounds incredible now. I have always liked this mic, but now I love it. There is a big improvement in the mid-range and even the bottom end compared to a non-modded NTK. This is now my "go-to" vocal microphone. It even sounds pretty darn good on acoustic guitar. Your modifications have made this microphone so much more useful to me. I want to compare it to my friend's $3500 Neumann U87 just to see the look on his face when he hears this mic!

--Gerald O.




John just did his stuff to my Studio Projects C1. I'm a voice actor, and have always kept the C1 as my 'go-to' for character voicing only. It was always a little too harsh, sometimes shrill and colored for use in 'straight' reads.

In my testing since the upgrade, I'm finding a new smoothness and transparency. The overall character of the mic remains, however, with tighter lows, solid mids, and still a nice sparkle in the higher frequencies. These improvements will now enable me to start using this mic on more subtle, intimate applications where a more natural sound is needed.

--Mark Taylor




We have been recording with my Blue Mouse. NICE work on the mod, it sounds GREAT!!

--Mark Donovan, www.austintoboston.com